# Chapter 15. "Of Cube Roots, and of Irrational Numbers resulting from them."

### Part I. Section I. Chapter 15. “Of Cube Roots, and of Irrational Numbers resulting from them.”

158 As we can, in the manner already explained, find
the cube of a given number, so, when a number is proposed,
we may also reciprocally find a number, which, multiplied
twice by itself, will produce that number. The number
here sought is called, with relation to the other, the **cube
root**; so that the cube root of a given number is the number
whose cube is equal to that given number.

159 It is easy therefore to determine the cube root, when the number proposed is a real cube, such as in the examples in the last chapter; for we easily perceive that the cube root of 1 is 1; that of 8 is 2; that of 27 is 3; that of 64 is 4, and so on. And, in the same manner, the cube root of -27 is -3; and that of -125 is -5.

Farther, if the proposed number be a fraction, as ⁸⁄₂₇, the cube root of it must be ⅔; and that of ⁶⁴⁄₃₄₃ is ⁴⁄₇. Lastly, the cube root of a mixed number, such as 2¹⁰⁄₂₇ must be ⁴⁄₃, or 1⅓; because 2¹⁰⁄₂₇ is equal to ⁶⁴⁄₂₇.

160 But if the proposed number be not a cube, its cube root cannot be expressed either in integers, or in fractional numbers. For example, 43 is not a cubic number; therefore it is impossible to assign any number, either integer or fractional, whose cube shall be exactly 43. We may however affirm, that the cube root of that number is greater than 3, since the cube of 3 is only 27; and less than 4, because the cube of 4 is 64: we know, therefore, that the cube root required is necessarily contained between the numbers 3 and 4.

161 Since the cube root of 43 is greater than 3, if we add a fraction to 3, it is certain that we may approximate still nearer and nearer to the true value of this root: but we can never assign the number which expresses the value exactly; because the cube of a mixed number can never be perfectly equal to an integer, such as 43. If we were to suppose, for example, 3½, or ⁷⁄₂ to be the cube root required, the error would be ⅛; for the cube of ⁷⁄₂ is only ³⁴³⁄₈, or 42⅞.

162 This therefore shews, that the cube root of 43 cannot be expressed in any way,
either by integers or by fractions. However, we have a distinct idea of the magnitude
of this root; and therefore we use, in order to represent it,
the sign ∛, which we place before the proposed number,
and which is read **cube root**, to distinguish it from the square
root, which is often called simply the root; thus ∛43 means
the cube root of 43; that is to say, the number whose cube
is 43, or which, multiplied by itself, and then by itself again,
produces 43.

163 Now, it is evident that such expressions cannot belong to rational quantities, but that they rather form a particular species of irrational quantities. They have nothing in common with square roots, and it is not possible to express such a cube root by a square root; as, for example, by √12; for the square of √12 being 12, its cube will be 12√12, consequently still irrational, and therefore it cannot be equal to 43.

164 If the proposed number be a real cube, our expressions become rational. Thus, ∛l is equal to 1; ∛8 is equal to 2; ∛27 is equal to 3; and, generally, \(\sqrt[3]{\vphantom{1}}aaa\) is equal to \(a\).

165 If it were proposed to multiply one cube root, \(\sqrt[3]{\vphantom{1}}a\), by another, \(\sqrt[3]{\vphantom{1}}b\), the product must be \(\sqrt[3]{\vphantom{1}}ab\); for we know that the cube root of a product \(ab\) is found by multiplying together the cube roots of the factors. Hence, also, if we divide \(\sqrt[3]{\vphantom{1}}a\) by \(\sqrt[3]{\vphantom{1}}b\), the quotient will be \(\sqrt[3]{\vphantom{1}} \frac{a}{b}\).

166 We farther perceive, that \(2\sqrt[3]{\vphantom{1}}a\) is equal to \(\sqrt[3]{\vphantom{1}}8a\), because 2 is equivalent to ∛8; that \(3\sqrt[3]{\vphantom{1}}a\) is equal to \(\sqrt[3]{\vphantom{1}}27a\), \(b\sqrt[3]{\vphantom{1}}a\) is equal to \(\sqrt[3]{\vphantom{1}}abbb\); and, reciprocally, if the number under the radical sign has a factor which is a cube, we may make it disappear by placing its cube root before the sign; for example, instead of \(\sqrt[3]{\vphantom{1}}64a\) we may write \(4\sqrt[3]{\vphantom{1}}a\); and \(5\sqrt[3]{\vphantom{1}}a\) instead of \(\sqrt[3]{\vphantom{1}}a\): hence ∛16 is equal to 2∛2, because 16 is equal to 8·2.

167 When a number proposed is negative, its cube root is not subject to the same difficulties that occurred in treating of square roots; for, since the cubes of negative numbers are negative, it follows that the cube roots of negative numbers are also negative thus ∛-8 is equal to -2, and ∛-27 to -3. It follows also, that ∛-12 is the same as -∛12, and that \(\sqrt[3]{\vphantom{1}}-a\) may be expressed by \(-\sqrt[3]{\vphantom{1}}a\). Whence we see that the sign -, when it is found after the sign of the cube root, might also have been placed before it. We are not therefore led here to impossible, or imaginary numbers, which happened in considering the square roots of negative numbers.

#### Editions

- Leonhard Euler.
*Elements of Algebra*. Translated by Rev. John Hewlett. Third Edition. Longmans, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Co. London. 1822. - Leonhard Euler.
*Vollständige Anleitung zur Algebra. Mit den Zusätzen von Joseph Louis Lagrange.*Herausgegeben von Heinrich Weber. B. G. Teubner. Leipzig and Berlin. 1911. Leonhardi Euleri Opera omnia. Series prima. Opera mathematica. Volumen primum.