Jointly measurable and progressively measurable stochastic processes

Jordan Bell
June 18, 2015

1 Jointly measurable stochastic processes

Let E=ℝd with Borel ℰ, let I=ℝ≥0, which is a topological space with the subspace topology inherited from ℝ, and let (Ω,ℱ,P) be a probability space. For a stochastic process (Xt)t∈I with state space E, we say that X is jointly measurable if the map (t,ω)↦Xt⁢(ω) is measurable ℬI⊗ℱ→ℰ.

For ω∈Ω, the path t↦Xt⁢(ω) is called left-continuous if for each t∈I,

Xs⁢(ω)→Xt⁢(ω),s↑t.

We prove that if the paths of a stochastic process are left-continuous then the stochastic process is jointly measurable.11 1 cf. Charalambos D. Aliprantis and Kim C. Border, Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhiker’s Guide, third ed., p. 153, Lemma 4.51.

Theorem 1.

If X is a stochastic process with state space E and all the paths of X are left-continuous, then X is jointly measurable.

Proof.

For n≥1, t∈I, and ω∈Ω, let

Xtn⁢(ω)=∑k=0∞1[k⁢2-n,(k+1)⁢2-n)⁢(t)⁢Xk⁢2-n⁢(ω).

Each Xn is measurable ℬI⊗ℱ→ℰ: for B∈ℰ,

{(t,ω)∈I×Ω:Xtn(ω)∈B}=⋃k=0∞[k2-n,(k+1)2-n)×{Xk⁢2-n∈B}.

Let t∈I. For each n there is a unique kn for which t∈[kn⁢2-n,(kn+1)⁢2-n), and thus Xtn⁢(ω)=Xkn⁢2-n⁢(ω). Furthermore, kn⁢2-n↑t, and because s↦Xs⁢(ω) is left-continuous, Xkn⁢2-n⁢(ω)→Xt⁢(ω). That is, Xn→X pointwise on I×Ω, and because each Xn is measurable ℬI⊗ℱ→ℰ this implies that X is measurable ℬI⊗ℱ→ℰ.22 2 Charalambos D. Aliprantis and Kim C. Border, Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhiker’s Guide, third ed., p. 142, Lemma 4.29. Namely, the stochastic process (Xt)t∈I is jointly measurable, proving the claim. ∎

2 Adapted stochastic processes

Let ℱI=(ℱt)t∈I be a filtration of ℱ. A stochastic process X is said to be adapted to the filtration FI if for each t∈I the map

ω↦Xt⁢(ω),Ω→E,

is measurable ℱt→ℰ, in other words, for each t∈I,

σ⁢(Xt)⊂ℱt.

For a stochastic process (Xt)t∈I, the natural filtration of X is

σ(Xs:s≤t).

It is immediate that this is a filtration and that X is adapted to it.

3 Progressively measurable stochastic processes

Let ℱI=(ℱt)t∈I be a filtration of ℱ. A function X:I×Ω→E is called progressively measurable with respect to the filtration FI if for each t∈I, the map

(s,ω)↦X⁢(s,ω),[0,t]×Ω→E,

is measurable ℬ[0,t]⊗ℱt→ℰ. We denote by ℳ0⁢(ℱI) the set of functions I×Ω→E that are progressively measurable with respect to the filtration ℱI. We shall speak about a stochastic process (Xt)t∈I being progressively measurable, by which we mean that the map (t,ω)↦Xt⁢(ω) is progressively measurable.

We denote by Prog⁢(ℱI) the collection of those subsets A of I×Ω such that for each t∈I,

([0,t]×Ω)∩A∈ℬ[0,t]⊗ℱt.

We prove in the following that this is a σ-subalgebra of ℬI⊗ℱ and that it is the coarsest σ-algebra with which all progressively measurable functions are measurable.

Theorem 2.

Let ℱI=(ℱt)t∈I be a filtration of ℱ.

  1. 1.

    Prog⁢(ℱI) is a σ-subalgebra of ℬI⊗ℱ, and is the σ-algebra generated by the collection of functions I×Ω→E that are progressively measurable with respect to the filtration ℱI:

    Prog⁢(ℱI)=σ⁢(ℳ0⁢(ℱI)).
  2. 2.

    If X:I×Ω→E is progressively measurable with respect to the filtration ℱI, then the stochastic process (Xt)t∈I is jointly measurable and is adapted to the filtration.

Proof.

If A1,A2,…∈Prog⁢(ℱI) and t∈I then

([0,t]×Ω)∩⋃n≥1An=⋃n≥1(([0,t]×Ω)∩An),

which is a countable union of elements of the σ-algebra ℬ[0,t]⊗ℱt and hence belongs to ℬ[0,t]⊗ℱt, showing that ⋃n≥1An∈Prog⁢(ℱI). If A1,A2∈Prog⁢(ℱI) and t∈I then

([0,t]×Ω)∩(A1∩A2)=(([0,t]×Ω)∩A1)∩(([0,t]×Ω)∩A2),

which is an intersection of two elements of ℬ[0,t]⊗ℱt and hence belongs to ℬ[0,t]⊗ℱt, showing that A1∩A2∈Prog⁢(ℱI). Thus Prog⁢((ℱt)t∈I) is a σ-algebra.

If X:I×Ω→E is progressively measurable, B∈ℰ, and t∈I, then

([0,t]×Ω)∩X-1⁢(B)={(s,ω)∈[0,t]×Ω:X⁢(s,ω)∈B}.

Because X is progressively measurable, this belongs to ℬ[0,t]⊗ℱt. This is true for all t, hence X-1⁢(B)∈Prog⁢(ℱI), which means that X is measurable Prog⁢(ℱI)→ℰ.

If X:I×Ω→E is measurable Prog⁢(ℱI)→ℰ, t∈I, and B∈ℰ, then because X-1⁢(B)∈Prog⁢(ℱI), we have ([0,t]×Ω)∩X-1⁢(B)∈ℬ[0,t]⊗ℱt. This is true for all B∈ℰ, which means that (s,ω)↦X⁢(s,ω), [0,t]×Ω→E, is measurable ℬ[0,t]⊗ℱt, and because this is true for all t, X is progressively measurable. Therefore a function I×Ω→E is progressively measurable if and only if it is measurable Prog⁢(ℱI)→ℰ, which shows that Prog⁢(ℱI) is the coarsest σ-algebra with which all progressively measurable functions are measurable.

If X:I×Ω→E is a progressively measurable function and B∈ℰ,

X-1⁢(B)=⋃k≥1(([0,k]×Ω)∩X-1⁢(B)).

Because X is progressively measurable,

([0,k]×Ω)∩X-1⁢(B)∈ℬ[0,k]⊗ℱk⊂ℬI⊗ℱ,

thus X-1⁢(B) is equal to a countable union of elements of ℬI⊗ℱ and so itself belongs to ℬI⊗ℱ. Therefore X is measurable ℬI⊗ℱ→ℰ, namely X is jointly measurable.

Because Prog⁢(ℱI) is the σ-algebra generated by the collection of progressively measurable functions and each progressively measurable function is measurable ℬI⊗ℱ,

Prog⁢(ℱI)⊂ℬI⊗ℱ,

and so Prog⁢(ℱI) is indeed a σ-subalgebra of ℬI⊗ℱ.

Let t∈I. That X is progressively measurable means that

(s,ω)↦X⁢(s,ω),[0,t]×Ω

is measurable ℬ[0,t]⊗ℱt→ℰ. This implies that for each s∈[0,t] the map ω↦X⁢(s,ω) is measurable ℱt→ℰ.33 3 Charalambos D. Aliprantis and Kim C. Border, Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhiker’s Guide, third ed., p. 152, Theorem 4.48. (Generally, if a function is jointly measurable then it is separately measurable in each argument.) In particular, ω↦X⁢(t,ω) is measurable ℱt→ℰ, which means that the stochastic process (Xt)t∈I is adapted to the filtration, completing the proof. ∎

We now prove that if a stochastic process is adapted and left-continuous then it is progressively measurable.44 4 cf. Daniel W. Stroock, Probability Theory: An Analytic View, second ed., p. 267, Lemma 7.1.2.

Theorem 3.

Let (ℱt)t∈I be a filtration of ℱ. If (Xt)t∈I is a stochastic process that is adapted to this filtration and all its paths are left-continuous, then X is progressively measurable with respect to this filtration.

Proof.

Write X⁢(t,ω)=Xt⁢(ω). For t∈I, let Y be the restriction of X to [0,t]×Ω. We wish to prove that Y is measurable ℬ[0,t]⊗ℱt→ℰ. For n≥1, define

Yn⁢(s,ω)=∑k=02n-11[k⁢t⁢2-n,(k+1)⁢t⁢2-n)⁢(s)⁢Y⁢(k⁢t⁢2-n,ω)+1{t}⁢(s)⁢Y⁢(t,ω).

Because X is adapted to the filtration, each Yn is measurable ℬ[0,t]⊗ℱt→ℰ. Because X has left-continuous paths, for (s,ω)∈[0,t]×Ω,

Yn⁢(s,ω)→Y⁢(s,ω).

Since Y is the pointwise limit of Yn, it follows that Y is measurable ℬ[0,t]⊗ℱt→ℰ, and so X is progressively measurable. ∎

4 Stopping times

Let ℱI=(ℱt)t∈I be a filtration of ℱ. A function T:Ω→[0,∞] is called a stopping time with respect to the filtration FI if

{T≤t}∈ℱt,t∈I.

It is straightforward to prove that a stopping time is measurable ℱ→ℬ[0,∞]. Let

ℱ∞=σ(ℱt:t∈I).

We define

ℱT={A∈ℱ∞:if t∈I then A∩{T≤t}∈ℱt}.

It is straightforward to check that T is measurable ℱT→ℬ[0,∞], and in particular {T<∞}∈ℱT.

For a stochastic process (Xt)t∈I with state space E, we define XT:Ω→E by

XT⁢(ω)=1{T<∞}⁢(ω)⁢XT⁢(ω)⁢(ω).

We prove that if X is progressively measurable then XT is measurable ℱT→ℰ.55 5 Sheng-wu He and Jia-gang Wang and Jia-An Yan, Semimartingale Theory and Stochastic Calculus, p. 86, Theorem 3.12.

Theorem 4.

If ℱI=(ℱt)t∈I is a filtration of ℱ, (Xt)t∈I is a stochastic process that is progressively measurable with respect to ℱI, and T is a stopping time with respect to ℱI, then XT is measurable ℱT→ℰ.

Proof.

For t∈I, using that T is a stopping time we check that ω↦T⁢(ω)∧t is measurable ℱt→ℬ[0,t], and then ω↦(T⁢(ω)∧t,ω), Ω→[0,t]×Ω, is measurable ℱt→ℬ[0,t]⊗ℱt.66 6 Charalambos D. Aliprantis and Kim C. Border, Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhiker’s Guide, third ed., p. 152, Lemma 4.49. Because X is progressively measurable, (s,ω)↦Xs⁢(ω) is measurable ℬ[0,t]⊗ℱt→ℰ. Therefore the composition

ω↦XT⁢(ω)∧t⁢(ω),Ω→E,

is measurable ℱt→ℰ, and a fortiori it is measurable ℱ∞→ℰ. We have

XT⁢(ω)=limn→∞⁡1{T≤n}⁢(ω)⁢XT⁢(ω)∧n⁢(ω),

and because ω↦1{T≤n}⁢(ω)⁢XT⁢(ω)∧n⁢(ω) is measurable ℱ∞→ℰ, it follows that ω↦XT⁢(ω) is measurable ℱ∞→ℰ. For B∈ℰ,

{XT∈B}∩{T≤t}={ω∈Ω:XT⁢(ω)∧t(ω)∈B}∩{T≤t}∈ℱt,

therefore {XT∈B}∈ℱT. This means that XT is measurable ℱT→ℰ. ∎

For a stochastic process (Xt)t∈I, a filtration ℱI=(ℱt)t∈I, and a stopping time T with respect to the filtration, we define

XtT⁢(ω)=XT⁢(ω)∧t⁢(ω),

and (XtT)t∈I is a stochastic process. We prove that if X is progressively measurable with respect to ℱI then the stochastic proces XT is progressively measurable with respect to ℱI.77 7 Ioannis Karatzas and Steven Shreve, Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus, p. 9, Proposition 2.18.

Theorem 5.

If (Xt)t∈I is a stochastic process that is progressively measurable with respect to a filtration ℱI=(ℱt)t∈I and T is a stopping time with respect to ℱI, then XT is progressively measurable with respect to ℱI.

Proof.

Let t∈I. Because T is a stopping time, for each s∈[0,t] the map ω↦T⁢(ω)∧s is measurable ℱs→ℬ[0,t] and a fortiori is measurable ℱt→ℬ[0,t]. Therefore (s,ω)↦T⁢(ω)∧s is measurable ℬ[0,t]⊗ℱt→ℬ[0,t],88 8 Charalambos D. Aliprantis and Kim C. Border, Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhiker’s Guide, third ed., p. 152, Theorem 4.48. and (s,ω)↦ω is measurable ℬ[0,t]⊗ℱt→ℱt. This implies that

(s,ω)↦(T⁢(ω)∧s,ω),[0,t]×Ω→[0,t]×Ω,

is measurable ℬ[0,t]⊗ℱt→ℬ[0,t]⊗ℱt.99 9 Charalambos D. Aliprantis and Kim C. Border, Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhiker’s Guide, third ed., p. 152, Lemma 4.49. Because X is progressively measurable,

(s,ω)↦Xs⁢(ω),[0,t]×Ω→E,

is measurable ℬ[0,t]⊗ℱt→ℰ. Therefore the composition

(s,ω)↦XT⁢(ω)∧s⁢(ω),[0,t]×Ω→E,

is measurable ℬ[0,t]⊗ℱt→ℰ, which shows that XT is progressively measurable. ∎