Laguerre polynomials and Perron-Frobenius operators

Jordan Bell
April 19, 2016

1 Laguerre polynomials

1.1 Definition and generating functions

Let D=dd⁢x. For α>-1 and n≥0 let

Lnα⁢(x)=ex⁢x-αn!⁢Dn⁢(e-x⁢xn+α),

called the Laguerre polynomials. Using the Leibniz rule for Dn⁢(f⋅g) yields

Lnα⁢(x)=∑k=0nΓ⁢(n+α+1)Γ⁢(k+α+1)⁢(-x)kk!⁢(n-k)!.

The generating function for the Laguerre polynomials is11 1 N. N. Lebedev, Special Functions and Their Applications, p. 77, §4.17.

w⁢(x,z)=(1-z)-α-1⁢e-x⁢z/(1-z)=∑n=0∞Lnα⁢(x)⁢zn,|z|<1.

Define

W⁢(x,y,z)=(1-z)-1⁢e-(x+y)⁢z/(1-z)⁢(x⁢y⁢z)-α/2⁢Iα⁢(2⁢x⁢y⁢z1-z),|z|<1,

where

Iα⁢(x)=i-α⁢Jα⁢(i⁢x)=∑m=0∞1m!⁢Γ⁢(m+α+1)⁢(x/2)2⁢m+α

and

Jα⁢(x)=∑m=0∞(-1)mm!⁢Γ⁢(m+α+1)⁢(x/2)2⁢m+α.

W satisfies

W⁢(x,y,z)=∑n=0∞n!⁢Lnα⁢(x)⁢Lnα⁢(y)Γ⁢(n+α+1)⁢zn.

1.2 Differential equations satisfied by Laguerre polynomials

w satisfies the ordinary differential equation

(1-z2)⁢∂z⁡w+(x-(1-z)⁢(1+α))⁢w=0.

This yields, for n≥1,

(n+1)⁢Ln+1α⁢(x)+(x-α-2⁢n-1)⁢Lnα⁢(x)+(n+α)⁢Ln-1α⁢(x)=0. (1)

w also satisfies the ordinary differential equation

(1-t)⁢∂x⁡w+t⁢w=0,

which yields, for n≥1,

D⁢Lnα-D⁢Ln-1α+Ln-1α=0. (2)

Using (1) and (2) gives

x⁢D⁢Lnα=n⁢Lnα-(n+α)⁢Ln-1α,n≥1. (3)

Using (3) and (2) we get, for n≥0,

x⁢D2⁢Lnα⁢(x)+(α+1-x)⁢D⁢Lnα⁢(x)+n⁢Lnα⁢(x)=0. (4)

1.3 Integral formulas for Laguerre polynomials

For ν>-1, a>0, b>0, using the series for Jν one calculates22 2 N. N. Lebedev, Special Functions and Their Applications, p. 132, §5.15, Example 2.

∫0∞e-a2⁢x2⁢Jν⁢(b⁢x)⁢xν+1⁢𝑑x=bν(2⁢a2)ν+1⁢e-b24⁢a2. (5)

Applying this with ν=n+α, a=1, b=2⁢x, x=t yields

∫0∞e-t⁢Jn+α⁢(2⁢x⁢t)⁢(t)n+α+1⋅12⁢t⁢𝑑t=(2⁢x)n+α2n+α+1⁢e-x,

i.e.

∫0∞e-t⁢Jn+α⁢(2⁢x⁢t)⁢(x⁢t)n+α⁢𝑑t=e-x⁢xn+α. (6)

Now, it is a fact that

dd⁢u⁢uν/2⁢Jν⁢(2⁢u)=u(ν-1)/2⁢Jν-1⁢(2⁢u),

and using this and (6), we get that for α>1 and n≥0,

Lnα⁢(x)=ex⁢x-α/2n!⁢∫0∞tn+α/2⁢Jα⁢(2⁢x⁢t)⁢e-t⁢𝑑t. (7)

We remind ourselves that for α>-1 and |z|<1,

(1-z)-α-1⁢e-y⁢t/(1-t)=∑n=0∞Lnα⁢(y)⁢zn.

For |z|<13, using this and e-y⁢t1-t-y2=e-2⁢y⁢t+y-y⁢t2⁢(1-t)=e-y⁢(1+t)2⁢(1-t) one checks that

(1-z)-α-1⁢∫0∞e-y⁢(1+t)2⁢(1-t)⁢yα/2⁢Jα⁢(x⁢y)⁢𝑑y=∑n=0∞zn⁢∫0∞e-y/2⁢yα/2⁢Jα⁢(x⁢y)⁢Lnα⁢(y)⁢𝑑y.

Then one gets, for |z|<1,

2⁢e-x/2⁢xα/2⁢∑n=0∞(-1)n⁢Lnα⁢(x)⁢zn=∑n=0∞zn⁢∫0∞e-y/2⁢yα/2⁢Jα⁢(x⁢y)⁢Lnα⁢(y)⁢𝑑y.

Therefore for α>-1 and n≥0,

e-x/2⁢xα/2⁢Lnα⁢(x)=(-1)n2⁢∫0∞Jα⁢(x⁢y)⁢e-y/2⁢yα/2⁢Lnα⁢(y)⁢𝑑y. (8)

1.4 Orthogonality of Laguerre polynomials

Let

ρα⁢(x)=e-x⁢xα.

Let

un=ρα1/2⁢Lnα,n≥0.

un satisfies the differential equation

(x⁢un′)′+(n+α+12-x4-α24⁢x)⁢un=0.

Using this we get

x⁢(un′⁢um-um′⁢un)|0∞+(n-m)⁢∫0∞um⁢un⁢𝑑x=0.

Then

(n-m)⁢∫0∞um⁢un⁢𝑑x=0. (9)

Using (1) yields for n≥2,

n⁢(Lnα)2-(n+α)⁢(Ln-1α)2-(n+1)⁢Ln+1α⁢Ln-1α+2⁢Lnα⁢Ln-1α+(n+α-1)⁢Lnα⁢Ln-2α=0.

Using this and (9), for n≥2,

n⁢∫0∞e-x⁢xα⁢Lnα⁢(x)2⁢𝑑x=(n+α)⁢∫0∞e-x⁢xα⁢Ln-1α⁢(x)2⁢𝑑x.

Iterating this, for n≥2,

∫0∞e-x⁢xα⁢Lnα⁢(x)2⁢𝑑x =(n+α)⁢(n+α-1)⁢⋯⁢(α+2)n⁢(n-2)⁢⋯⁢3⋅2⁢∫0∞e-x⁢xα⁢L1α⁢(x)2⁢𝑑x
=Γ⁢(n+α+1)n!.

1.5 Asymptotics for Laguerre polynomials

It can be proved that for α>-1, with N=n+α+12,33 3 N. N. Lebedev, Special Functions and Their Applications, p. 87, §4.22. for x∈ℝ≥0,

Lnα⁢(x)∼Γ⁢(n+α+1)n!⁢ex/2⁢(N⁢x)-α/2⁢Jα⁢(2⁢N⁢x),n→∞.

1.6 Laguerre expansions

Suppose that f:ℝ>0→ℝ is piecewise smooth in every interval [x1,x2], 0<x1<x2<∞, and f∈L2⁢(d⁢ρα). Let

cn⁢(f)=n!Γ⁢(n+α+1)⁢∫0∞f⁢(x)⁢Lnα⁢(x)⁢ρα⁢(x)⁢𝑑x,

ρα⁢(x)=e-x⁢xα. It can be proved that44 4 N. N. Lebedev, Special Functions and Their Applications, p. 88, §4.23, Theorem 3. if f is continuous at x then

∑n=0Ncn⁢(f)⁢Lnα⁢(x)→f⁢(x),N→∞,

and if f is not continuous at x then

∑n=0Ncn⁢(f)⁢Lnα⁢(x)→f⁢(x+0)2+f⁢(x-0)2,N→∞,

which makes sense because f is a priori piecewise continuous.

Let ν>-12⁢(α+1) and f⁢(x)=xν. Integrating by parts,

cn⁢(f) =n!Γ⁢(n+α+1)⁢∫0∞xν+α⁢Lnα⁢(x)⁢e-x
=1Γ⁢(n+α+1)⁢∫0∞xν⁢Dn⁢(e-x⁢xn+α)⁢𝑑x
=(-1)n⁢Γ⁢(ν+α+1)⁢Γ⁢(ν+1)Γ⁢(n+α+1)⁢Γ⁢(ν-n+1).

Thus

xν=Γ⁢(ν+α+1)⁢Γ⁢(ν+1)⁢∑n=0∞(-1)n⁢Lnα⁢(x)Γ⁢(n+α+1)⁢Γ⁢(ν-n+1).

For p a positive integer,

xp=Γ⁢(p+α+1)⋅p!⁢∑n=0p(-1)n⁢Lnα⁢(x)Γ⁢(n+α+1)⋅(p-n)!.

Define

f⁢(x)=(a⁢x)-α/2⁢Jα⁢(2⁢a⁢x),α>-1,a>0,x>0.

Using

(1-z)-α-1⁢e-x⁢z/(1-z)=∑n=0∞Lnα⁢(x)⁢zn,|z|<1,

we obtain, as e-x⁢z1-z-x=e-x/(1-z),

(1-z)-α-1⁢∫0∞e-x/(1-z)⁢(x/a)α/2⁢Jα⁢(2⁢a⁢x)⁢𝑑x=∫0∞e-x⁢(x/a)α/2⁢Jα⁢(2⁢a⁢x)⁢∑n=0∞Lnα⁢(x)⁢zn⁢d⁢x=∑n=0∞(∫0∞f⁢(x)⁢Lnα⁢(x)⁢ρα⁢(x)⁢𝑑x)⁢zn.

Doing the change of variable 2⁢a⁢x=b⁢y with b>0 and then applying (6) with A2=b24⁢a⁢(1-z) and ν=α,

(1-z)-α-1⁢∫0∞e-x/(1-z)⁢(x/a)α/2⁢Jα⁢(2⁢a⁢x)⁢𝑑x=(1-z)-α-1⁢(2⁢a)-α-1⁢bα+2⁢∫0∞e-b2⁢y24⁢a⁢(1-z)⁢Jα⁢(b⁢y)⁢yα+1⁢𝑑y=(1-z)-α-1⁢(2⁢a)-α-1⁢bα+2⋅bα(2⁢A2)α+1⁢e-b24⁢A2=(1-z)-α-1⁢(2⁢a)-α-1⁢bα+2⋅b-α-2⁢(2⁢a⁢(1-z))α+1⁢e-a⁢(1-z)=e-a⁢(1-z)=e-a⁢∑n=0∞(a⁢z)nn!.

Therefore

e-a⁢∑n=0∞ann!⁢zn =∑n=0∞(∫0∞f⁢(x)⁢Lnα⁢(x)⁢ρα⁢(x)⁢𝑑x)⁢zn,

whence, for n≥0,

cn⁢(f)=n!Γ⁢(n+α+1)⁢∫0∞f⁢(x)⁢Lnα⁢(x)⁢ρα⁢(x)⁢𝑑x=n!Γ⁢(n+α+1)⁢e-a⁢ann!.

Therefore, for α>-1, a>0, x>0,

(a⁢x)-α/2⁢Jα⁢(2⁢a⁢x)=∑n=0∞cn⁢(f)⁢Lnα⁢(x)=e-a⁢∑n=0∞anΓ⁢(n+α+1)⁢Lnα⁢(x).

2 Integral operators

We remind ourselves that, for α=1,

un⁢(x)=ρ1⁢(x)1/2⁢Ln1⁢(x)=e-x/2⁢x1/2⁢Ln1⁢(x).

{un:n≥0} is an orthonormal basis for L2⁢(ℝ≥0).

For x,y∈ℝ>0 define

k⁢(x,y)=kx⁢(y)=kx⁢(y)=J1⁢(2⁢x⁢y)((ex-1)⁢(ey-1))1/2.

For ϕ∈L2⁢(ℝ≥0) and y∈ℝ>0, define

K⁢ϕ⁢(y) =∫ℝ≥0ky⁢(x)⁢ϕ⁢(x)⁢𝑑x.

We have established, with α=1,

J1⁢(2⁢x⁢y)=(x⁢y)1/2⁢e-x⁢∑n=0∞xn(n+1)!⁢Ln1⁢(y).

Hence

∫0∞ky⁢(x)⁢ϕ⁢(x)⁢𝑑x =∫0∞ϕ⁢(x)⁢(ex-1)-1/2⁢(ey-1)-1/2⁢(x⁢y)1/2⁢e-x
⋅∑n=0∞xn(n+1)!Lnα(y)dx
=∑n=0∞(ey-1)-1/2⁢y1/2⁢Ln1⁢(y)(n+1)!⁢∫0∞ϕ⁢(x)⁢(ex-1)-1/2⁢x1/2⁢e-x⁢xn⁢𝑑x
=∑n=0∞qn⁢(y)⁢⟨ϕ,pn⟩,

for

pn⁢(x)=1(n+1)!⁢(ex-1)-1/2⁢e-x⁢xn+12=1(n+1)!⁢e-x/2⁢(ex-1)-1/2⁢xn⁢un⁢(x)

and

qn⁢(y)=(ey-1)-1/2⁢y1/2⁢Ln1⁢(y)=(1-e-y)-1/2⁢un⁢(y).

Then

K⁢ϕ=∑n=0∞qn⁢⟨ϕ,pn⟩.

The following states the trace of the operator K:L2⁢(ℝ≥0)→L2⁢(ℝ≥0).55 5 cf. A. A. Kirillov, Elements of the Theory of Representations, p. 211, §13, Theorem 2.

Theorem 1.

tr⁢K=∫0∞k⁢(x,x)⁢𝑑x=∫0∞J1⁢(2⁢x)(ex-1)⁢𝑑x=0.7711⁢….

3 Hardy spaces

For x∈ℝ let Px={z∈ℂ:Re⁢z>x}. Let H be the collection of holomorphic functions f:P-1/2→ℂ such that for any x>-12, f|Px is bounded and such that

∫ℝ|f⁢(-12+i⁢y)|2⁢𝑑y<∞.

Define M:L2⁢(ℝ≥0)→H, for ϕ∈L2⁢(ℝ≥0), by

M⁢ϕ⁢(z)=∫ℝ≥0e-z⁢s-s/2⁢ϕ⁢(s)⁢𝑑s.

For f∈H define

Pλ⁢f⁢(z)=∑k≥11(z+k)2⁢f⁢(1z+k)  Re⁢z>-12,

called a Perron-Frobenius operator. λ denotes Lebesgue measure.

Let

h⁢(s)=(1-e-ss)1/2

for s∈ℝ>0, with h⁢(0)=1. Because h∈L∞⁢(μ), it makes sense to define S:L2⁢(ℝ≥0)→L2⁢(ℝ≥0) by

S⁢ϕ⁢(s)=h⁢ϕ,ϕ∈L2⁢(ℝ≥0).

Define A:H→L2⁢(ℝ≥0) by

A=S∘M-1.

We prove that Pλ and K are conjugate.66 6 Marius Iosifescu and Cor Kraaikamp, Metrical Theory of Continued Fractions, p. 9, Proposition 1.1.1.

Theorem 2.

Pλ=A-1⁢K⁢A.

Proof.

Let ϕ∈L2⁢(ℝ≥0) and set f=M⁢ϕ. Then

A-1⁢K⁢A⁢f=A-1⁢K⁢S⁢ϕ.

We calculate

(S-1⁢K⁢S⁢ϕ)⁢(x) =h⁢(x)-1⁢∫ℝ≥0kx⁢(y)⋅h⁢(y)⋅ϕ⁢(y)⁢𝑑y
=(x1-e-x)1/2⁢∫0∞J1⁢(2⁢x⁢y)((ex-1)⁢(ey-1))1/2⋅(1-e-yy)1/2⋅ϕ⁢(y)⁢𝑑y
=∫0∞(xy)1/2⁢ex/2(ex-1)1/2⁢(ey-1)1/2ey/2⁢J1⁢(2⁢x⁢y)((ex-1)⁢(ey-1))1/2⁢ϕ⁢(y)⁢𝑑y
=∫0∞(xy)1/2⁢e(x-y)/2ex-1⁢J1⁢(2⁢x⁢y)⁢ϕ⁢(y)⁢𝑑y.

Then

(M⁢S-1⁢K⁢S⁢ϕ)⁢(z)=∫ℝ≥0e-z⁢x-x/2⁢(S-1⁢K⁢S⁢ϕ)⁢(x)⁢𝑑x=∫0∞e-z⁢x-x/2⁢((xy)1/2⁢e(x-y)/2ex-1⁢J1⁢(2⁢x⁢y)⁢ϕ⁢(y)⁢d⁢y)⁢𝑑x=

It is a fact that for Re⁢z>-1 and for t≥0,

∑k≥0(z+k)-2⁢exp⁡(-tz+k)=∫0∞(s⁢t-1)1/2⁢e-z⁢s⁢J1⁢(2⁢s⁢t)es-1⁢𝑑s.

Using this,

(M⁢S-1⁢K⁢S⁢ϕ)⁢(z) =∫0∞e-y/2⁢(∫0∞(x⁢y-1)1/2⁢e-z⁢x⁢J1⁢(2⁢x⁢y)ex-1⁢𝑑x)⁢ϕ⁢(y)⁢𝑑y
=∫0∞e-y/2⁢∑k≥1(z+k)-2⁢exp⁡(-yz+k)⋅ϕ⁢(y)⁢d⁢y
=∑k≥1(z+k)-2⁢(∫0∞exp⁡(-yz+k-y2)⁢ϕ⁢(y)⁢𝑑y)
=∑k≥1(z+k)-2⋅M⁢ϕ⁢(1z+k).

Thus, as f=M⁢ϕ,

(M⁢S-1⁢K⁢S⁢M-1⁢f)⁢(z)=∑k≥1(z+k)-2⁢f⁢(1z+k)=Pλ⁢f⁢(z),

that is,

A-1⁢K⁢A⁢f⁢(z)=Pλ⁢f⁢(z).

∎