Integral operators

Jordan Bell
April 26, 2016

1 Product measures

Let (X,𝒜,μ) be a σ-finite measure space. Then with 𝒜⊗𝒜 the product σ-algebra and μ⊗μ the product measure on 𝒜⊗𝒜, (X×X,𝒜⊗𝒜,μ⊗μ) is itself a σ-finite measure space.

Write Fx⁢(y)=F⁢(x,y) and Fy⁢(x)=F⁢(x,y). For any measurable space (X′,𝒜′), it is a fact that if F:X×X→X′ is measurable then Fx is measurable for each x∈X and Fy is measurable for each y∈X.11 1 Heinz Bauer, Measure and Integration Theory, p. 138, Lemma 23.5.

Suppose that F∈ℒ1⁢(X×X), F:X→ℂ. Fubini’s theorem tells us the following.22 2 Heinz Bauer, Measure and Integration Theory, p. 139, Corollary 23.7. 33 3 Suppose that F:X×X→[0,∞] is measurable. Tonelli’s theorem, Heinz Bauer, Measure and Integration Theory, p. 138, Theorem 23.6, tells us that the functions x↦∫XFx⁢𝑑μ,y↦∫XFy⁢𝑑μ are measurable X→[0,∞], and that ∫X×XF⁢d⁢(μ⊗μ)=∫X(∫XFy⁢𝑑μ)⁢𝑑μ⁢(y)=∫X(∫XFx⁢𝑑μ)⁢𝑑μ⁢(x). There are sets N1,N2∈𝒜 with μ⁢(N1)=0 and μ⁢(N2)=0 such that if x∈N1c then Fx∈ℒ1⁢(X) and if y∈N2c then Fy∈ℒ1⁢(X). Define

I1⁢(x)={∫XFx⁢(y)⁢𝑑μ⁢(y)x∈N1c0x∈N1

and

I2⁢(y)={∫XFy⁢(x)⁢𝑑μ⁢(x)y∈N2c0y∈N2.

I1∈ℒ1⁢(X) and I2∈ℒ1⁢(X), and

∫X×XF⁢d⁢(μ⊗μ)=∫XI2⁢(y)⁢𝑑μ⁢(y)=∫XI1⁢(x)⁢𝑑μ⁢(x).

2 Integral operators in L2

Let k∈ℒ2⁢(X×X) and let g∈ℒ2⁢(X). By Fubini’s theorem, there is a set Z∈𝒜 with μ⁢(Z)=0 such that if x∈Zc then kx∈ℒ2⁢(X). For x∈Znc, by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality,

∫X|kx⁢g|⁢𝑑μ≤(∫X|kx|2⁢𝑑μ)1/2⁢(∫X|g|2⁢𝑑μ)1/2=∥kx∥L2⁢∥g∥L2,

so kx⁢g∈ℒ1⁢(X).

Since μ is σ-finite, there are An∈𝒜, μ⁢(An)<∞, with An↑X. For each n, the function (x,y)↦1An⁢(x)⁢g⁢(y) belongs to ℒ2⁢(X×X) and hence, by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, (x,y)↦k⁢(x,y)⁢1An⁢(x)⁢g⁢(y) belongs to ℒ1⁢(X×X). Applying Fubini’s theorem, there is a set Nn∈𝒜 with μ⁢(Nn)=0 such that if x∈Nnc then y↦k⁢(x,y)⁢1An⁢(x)⁢g⁢(y) belongs to ℒ1⁢(X), and the function In:X→ℂ defined by

In⁢(x)={∫Xkx⁢(y)⁢1An⁢(x)⁢g⁢(y)⁢𝑑μ⁢(y)x∈Nnc0x∈Nn

belongs to ℒ1⁢(X).

Let M=⋃n(Z∪Nn), for which

μ⁢(M)≤∑nμ⁢(Z∪Nn)≤∑n(μ⁢(Z)+μ⁢(Nn))=0.

We note

Mc=⋂n(Zc∩Nnc).

For g∈ℒ2⁢(X), define KM⁢g:X→ℂ by

KM⁢g⁢(x)={∫Xkx⁢(y)⁢g⁢(y)⁢𝑑μ⁢(y)x∈Mc0x∈M. (1)

For x∈Mc,

In⁢(x)=∫Xkx⁢(y)⁢1An⁢(x)⁢g⁢(y)⁢𝑑μ⁢(y)=1An⁢(x)⁢∫Xkx⁢(y)⁢g⁢(y)⁢𝑑μ⁢(y)=1An⁢(x)⋅KM⁢g⁢(x).

Then

1An⋅KM⁢g=1Mc⋅1An⋅K⁢g=1Mc⋅In,

which shows that fn=1An⋅KM⁢g is measurable X→ℂ. For any x∈X, for sufficiently large n we have fn⁢(x)=KM⁢g⁢(x), thus fn→KM⁢g pointwise, which implies that KM⁢g:X→ℂ is measurable.44 4 Charalambos D. Aliprantis and Kim C. Border, Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhiker’s Guide, third ed., p. 142, Lemma 4.29.

Using the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and then Fubini’s theorem,

∫X|KM⁢g⁢(x)|2⁢𝑑μ⁢(x) =∫Mc|∫Xkx⁢(y)⁢g⁢(y)⁢𝑑μ⁢(y)|2⁢𝑑μ⁢(x)
≤∥g∥L22⋅∫Mc(∫X|kx⁢(y)|2⁢𝑑μ⁢(y))⁢𝑑μ⁢(x)
=∥g∥L22⋅∥k∥L22.

This shows that KM⁢g∈ℒ2⁢(X), with

∥KM⁢g∥L2≤∥k∥L2⋅∥g∥L2.

Recapitulating, for g∈ℒ2⁢(X) there is some M∈𝒜 with μ⁢(M)=0 such that for x∈Mc, kx∈ℒ2⁢(X), and such that KM⁢g:X→ℂ defined by (1) belongs to ℒ2⁢(X). If N is any set satisfying these conditions, then for x∈Mc∩Nc,

KM⁢g⁢(x)=∫Xkx⁢(y)⁢g⁢(y)⁢𝑑μ⁢(y)=KN⁢g⁢(x),

and μ⁢((Mc∩Nc)c)=μ⁢(M∪N)=0. Therefore, for g∈ℒ2⁢(X) it makes sense to define K⁢g∈L2⁢(X) by K⁢g=KM⁢g.

If f,g∈ℒ2⁢(X) and f=g in L2⁢(X), check that K⁢f=K⁢g in L2⁢(X). We thus define K:L2⁢(X)→L2⁢(X) for g∈L2⁢(X) as

K⁢g⁢(x)=∫Xkx⁢(y)⁢g⁢(y)⁢𝑑μ⁢(y)=⟨g,kx¯⟩,

where

⟨f,g⟩=∫Xf⋅g¯⁢𝑑μ.
Theorem 1.

Let (X,A,μ) be a σ-finite measure space. For k∈L2⁢(X×X), it makes sense to define K⁢g∈L2⁢(X) by

K⁢g⁢(x)=∫Xkx⁢(y)⁢g⁢(y)⁢𝑑μ⁢(y)=⟨g,kx¯⟩.

K:L2⁢(X)→L2⁢(X) is a bounded linear operator with ∥K∥≤∥k∥L2.

3 Integrals of functions

Suppose that f:X→ℂ is a function, which we do not ask to be measurable, and that Z1,Z2∈𝒜, μ⁢(Z1)=0, μ⁢(Z2)=0, satisfy 1Z1c⋅f,1Z2c⋅f∈ℒ1⁢(X). We have

∫X1Z1c⋅f⁢𝑑μ =∫X1Z1c⋅(1Z2+1Z2c)⋅f⁢𝑑μ
=∫X1Z1c∩Z2⋅f⁢𝑑μ+∫X1Z1c∩Z2c⋅f⁢𝑑μ
=∫X1Z1c∩Z2c⋅f⁢𝑑μ
=∫X1Z2c∩Z1c⋅f⁢𝑑μ
=∫X1Z2c⋅f⁢𝑑μ.

Therefore if there is some Z∈𝒜 with μ⁢(Z)=0 and 1Z⋅f∈ℒ1⁢(X), it makes sense to define

∫Xf⁢𝑑μ=∫X1Z⋅f⁢𝑑μ.

However, only if f is itself measurable do we write f∈ℒ1⁢(X).

4 Self-adjoint operators

Theorem 2.

Let (X,A,μ) be a σ-finite measure space. For k∈L2⁢(X×X) satisfying kx=kx¯, K:L2⁢(X)→L2⁢(X) is self-adjoint.

Proof.

For f,g∈L2⁢(X),

⟨K⁢f,g⟩ =∫XK⁢f⁢(x)⋅g⁢(x)¯⁢𝑑μ⁢(x)
=∫X(∫Xkx⁢(y)⁢f⁢(y)⁢𝑑μ⁢(y))⁢g⁢(x)¯⁢𝑑μ⁢(x)
=∫X(∫Xky⁢(x)⋅g⁢(x)¯⁢𝑑μ⁢(x))⁢f⁢(y)⁢𝑑μ⁢(y)
=∫X(∫Xky⁢(x)¯⁢g⁢(x)¯⁢𝑑μ⁢(x))⁢f⁢(y)⁢𝑑μ⁢(y)
=∫XK⁢g⁢(y)¯⋅f⁢(y)⁢𝑑μ⁢(y)
=⟨f,K⁢g⟩.

It follows that K:L2⁢(X)→L2⁢(X) is self-adjoint. ∎

5 Hilbert-Schmidt operators

Let (X,𝒜,μ) be a measure space and let 1≤p<∞. It is a fact that if μ is σ-finite and 𝒜 is countably generated, then the Banach space Lp⁢(X) is separable.55 5 Donald L. Cohn, Measure Theory, second ed., p. 102, Proposition 3.4.5.

Theorem 3.

Let (X,A,μ) be a σ-finite countably generated measure space. For k∈L2⁢(X×X), K:L2⁢(X)→L2⁢(X) is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator with

∥K∥HS=∥k∥L2.
Proof.

L2⁢(X) is separable, so there is an orthonormal basis {en} for L2⁢(X). Using Parseval’s formula and then Fubini’s theorem,

∑n⟨K⁢en,K⁢en⟩ =∑n∫X|K⁢en⁢(x)|2⁢𝑑μ⁢(x)
=∑n∫X|⟨en,kx¯⟩|2⁢𝑑μ⁢(x)
=∫X(∑n|⟨en,kx¯⟩|2)⁢𝑑μ⁢(x)
=∫X⟨kx¯,kx¯⟩⁢𝑑μ⁢(x)
=∫X(∫X|kx|2⁢𝑑μ⁢(y))⁢𝑑μ⁢(x)
=∫X×X|k|2⁢d⁢(μ⊗μ)
=∥k∥L22.

This shows that

∥K∥HS=(∑n⟨K⁢en,K⁢en⟩)1/2=∥k∥L2.

∎

If T is a compact linear operator on L2⁢(X), then T*⁢T is a positive compact operator on L2⁢(X). Then |T|=T*⁢T is a positive compact operator.66 6 See Anton Deitmar and Siegfried Echterhoff, Principles of Harmonic Analysis, second ed., p. 109, Theorem 5.1.3 Let sj be the nonzero eigenvalues of |T| repeated according to geometric multiplicity, with sj+1≤sj, j≥1, called the singular values of T. By the spectral theorem, there is an orthonormal basis for {ej:j≥1} for L2⁢(X) such that |T|⁢ej=sj⁢ej for each j≥1. Then

∥T∥HS2 =∑j≥1⟨T⁢ej,T⁢ej⟩
=∑j≥1⟨T*⁢T⁢ej,ej⟩
=∑j≥1⟨|T|2⁢ej,ej⟩
=∑j≥1⟨|T|⁢ej,|T|⁢ej⟩
=∑j≥1⟨sj,sj⟩
=∑j≥1|sj|2.

Summarizing,

∥k∥L22=∥K∥HS2=∑j≥1|sj⁢(T)|2.

6 Trace class operators

A compact operator T on L2⁢(X) is called trace class if ∥T∥tr<∞, where

∥T∥tr=∑j≥1sj⁢(T).

For a trace class operator it makes sense to define

tr⁢(T)=∑n⟨T⁢en,en⟩,

which does not depend on the orthonormal basis {en} of L2⁢(X).

Let X be a locally compact Hausdorff space and let ℬ be the Borel σ-algebra of X. A Borel measure on X is a measure on ℬ. We say that a Borel measure μ on X is locally finite if for each x∈X there is an open set Ux with x∈Ux and μ⁢(Ux)<∞. A Radon measure on X is a locally finite Borel measure μ on X such that for each A∈ℬ and for any ϵ>0 there is an open set Uϵ with A⊂Uϵ and

μ⁢(A)>μ⁢(Uϵ)-ϵ

and for each open set U and for any ϵ>0 there is a compact set Kϵ with Kϵ⊂U and

μ⁢(U)<μ⁢(Kϵ)+ϵ.

By definition, if μ is a Radon measure then μ⁢(U) can be approximated by μ⁢(K) for compact sets K contained in U. We prove that this holds for μ⁢(A) if μ⁢(A)<∞.77 7 Anton Deitmar and Siegfried Echterhoff, Principles of Harmonic Analysis, second ed., p. 291, Lemma B.2.1.

Lemma 4.

Let X be a locally compact Hausdorff space and let μ be a Radon measure on X. If A∈B with μ⁢(A)<∞, there for any ϵ>0 there is a compact set Kϵ, Kϵ⊂A, such that

μ⁢(A)<μ⁢(Kϵ)+ϵ.
Proof.

If L is a compact set, B∈ℬ, and B⊂L, let T=L∖B. For δ>0 there is an open set Wδ, T⊂Wδ, such that μ⁢(Wδ)<μ⁢(T)+δ. Let Kδ=L∖Wδ, and because X is Hausdorff, L is closed and hence Kδ is closed and therefore compact. Now, as B⊂L,

L∖Wδ⊂L∖T=L∖(L∖B)=B

and

μ⁢(B∖Kδ)=μ⁢(B∖(L∖Wδ))≤μ⁢(Wδ∖(L∖B))=μ⁢(Wδ∖T)<δ.

We have proved that if L is a compact set and B is a Borel set contained in L, then for any δ>0 then there is a compact set Kδ with Kδ⊂B and

μ⁢(B∖Kδ)<δ.

Now let U be an open set with A⊂U and μ⁢(U)<∞, say μ⁢(U)<μ⁢(A)+1. Let L be a compact set with L⊂U and

μ⁢(U)<μ⁢(L)+ϵ.

A=(A∩L)∪(A∖L), so

μ⁢(A)=μ⁢(A∩L)+μ⁢(A∖L),

and

μ⁢(A∖L)≤μ⁢(U∖L)<ϵ.

Let B=A∩L. Because B is a Borel set contained in a compact set L, there is a compact set K contained in B such that

μ⁢(B∖K)<ϵ.

As A=B∪(A∖L) and K⊂B,

μ⁢(A∖K)=μ⁢((B∖K)∪(A∖L))=μ⁢(B∖K)+μ⁢(A∖L)<2⁢ϵ.

∎

Let X be a locally compact Hausdorff space and let μ be a Radon measure on X. An admissible kernel is a function k∈C⁢(X×X)∩ℒ2⁢(X×X) for which there is some g∈C⁢(X)∩ℒ2⁢(X) such that |k⁢(x,y)|≤g⁢(x)⁢g⁢(y) for all (x,y)∈X×X. We call S:L2⁢(X)→L2⁢(X) an admissible integral operator if there is an admissible kernel k such that

S⁢g⁢(x)=∫Xkx⁢(y)⁢g⁢(y)⁢𝑑μ⁢(y).

The following gives conditions under which we can calculate the trace of an integral operator.88 8 Anton Deitmar and Siegfried Echterhoff, Principles of Harmonic Analysis, second ed., p. 172, Proposition 9.3.1.

Theorem 5.

Let X be a first-countable locally compact Hausdorff space and let μ be a Radon measure on X. Let k∈C⁢(X×X)∩L2⁢(X) and let

K⁢g⁢(x)=∫Xkx⁢(y)⁢g⁢(y)⁢𝑑μ⁢(y).

If there are admissible integral operators S1 and S2 such that K=S1⁢S2, then K is of trace class and

tr⁢(K)=∫Xk⁢(x,x)⁢𝑑μ⁢(x).

The following is Mercer’s theorem.99 9 E. Brian Davies, Linear Operators and their Spectra, p. 156, Proposition 5.6.9.

Theorem 6 (Mercer’s theorem).

If k∈C⁢(X×X)∩L2⁢(X×X) and K:L2⁢(X)→L2⁢(X) is a positive operator, then

tr⁢(K)=∫Xk⁢(x,x)⁢𝑑μ⁢(x).