The Glivenko-Cantelli theorem

Jordan Bell
April 12, 2015

1 Narrow topology

Let X be a metrizable space and let Cb⁢(X) be the Banach space of bounded continuous functions X→ℝ, with the norm ∥f∥=supx∈X⁡|f⁢(x)|. If X is metrizable with the metric d, let Ud⁢(X) be the collection of bounded d-uniformly continuous functions X→ℝ. This is a vector space and is a closed subset of Cb⁢(X), thus is itself a Banach space.

Let X be a metrizable space and denote by 𝒫⁢(X) the collection of Borel probability measures on X. The narrow topology on P⁢(X) is the coarsest topology on 𝒫⁢(X) such that for every f∈Cb⁢(X), the mapping μ↦∫Xf⁢𝑑μ is continuous 𝒫⁢(X)→ℝ. It can be proved that if X is metrizable with a metric d and D is a dense subset of Ud⁢(X), then the narrow topology is equal to the coarsest topology such that for each f∈Ud⁢(X), the mapping μ↦∫Xf⁢𝑑μ is continuous 𝒫⁢(X)→ℝ.11 1 Charalambos D. Aliprantis and Kim C. Border, Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhiker’s Guide, third ed., p. 507, Theorem 15.2.

If X is a separable metrizable space, then it is metrizable by a metric d such that the metric space (X,d) is totally bounded. It is a fact that if (X,d) is a totally bounded metric space, then Ud⁢(X) is separable.22 2 Daniel W. Stroock, Probability Theory: An Analytic View, p. 371, Lemma 9.1.4.

Theorem 1.

If X is a separable metrizable space, then X is metrizable by a metric d for which there is a countable dense subset D of Ud⁢(X) such that μn converges narrowly to μ if and only if

∫Xf⁢𝑑μn→∫Xf⁢𝑑μ,f∈D.

2 Independent and identically distributed random variables

Let (Ω,S,P) be a probability space and let X be a separable metric space, with the Borel σ-algebra ℬX. We say that a finite collection measurable functions ξi:Ω→X, 1≤i≤n, is independent if

P⁢(⋂i=1nξi-1⁢(Ai))=∏i=1nP⁢(ξi-1⁢(Ai)),A1,…,An∈ℬX,

i.e.

P(ξ1∈A1,…,ξn∈An)=P(ξ1∈A1)⋯P(ξn∈An),A1,…,An∈ℬX.

We say that a family of measurable functions is independent if every finite subset of it is independent.

We say that two measurable functions f,g:Ω→X are identically distributed if the pushforward f*⁢P of P by f is equal to the pushforward g*⁢P of P by g, i.e. P⁢(f-1⁢(A))=P⁢(g-1⁢(A)) for every A∈ℬX. We say that a family of measurable functions is identically distributed if any two of them are identically distributed.

3 Strong law of large numbers

If ζ∈L1⁢(P), the expectation of ζ is

E⁢(ζ)=∫Ωζ⁢𝑑P,

and by the change of variables theorem,

∫Ωζ⁢(ω)⁢𝑑P⁢(ω)=∫ℝx⁢d⁢(ζ*⁢P)⁢(x).

The strong law of large numbers33 3 M. Loève, Probability Theory I, 4th ed., p. 251, 17.B. states that if ζ1,ζ2,…∈L1⁢(P) are independent and identically distributed, with common expectation E0, then

P⁢({ω∈Ω:∑i=1nζi⁢(ω)n→E0})=1.

4 Sample distributions

Let X be a separable metrizable space and let ξ1,ξ2,… be independent and identically distributed measurable functions Ω→X. For ω∈Ω, define μnω on ℬX by

μnω=∑i=1n1n⁢δξi⁢(ω),

which is a probability measure. We call the sequence μnω the sample distribution of ω.

The following is the Glivenko-Cantelli theorem, which shows that the sample distributions of a sequence of independent and identically distributed measurable functions converge narrowly almost everywhere to the common pushforward measure.44 4 K. R. Parthasarathy, Probability Measures on Metric Spaces, p. 53, Theorem 7.1.

Theorem 2 (Glivenko-Cantelli theorem).

Let (Ω,S,P) be a probability space, let X be a separable metrizable space and let ξ1,ξ2,… be independent and identically distributed measurable functions Ω→X, with common pushforward measure μ. Then

P⁢({ω∈Ω:μnω→μ narrowly})=1.
Proof.

For g∈Cb⁢(X), g∘ξi:Ω→ℝ is measurable bounded, hence belongs to L1⁢(P). Also, (g∘ξi)*⁢P=g*⁢μ, so the sequence g∘ξi are identically distributed. We now check that the sequence is independent. Let A1,…,An∈ℬℝ. Then g-1⁢(A1),…,g-1⁢(An)∈ℬX, and because ξ1,ξ2,… are independent,

P⁢(⋂i=1nξi-1⁢(g-1⁢(Ai)))=∏i=1nP⁢(ξi-1⁢(g-1⁢(Ai))),

i.e.,

P⁢(⋂i=1n(g∘ξi)-1⁢(Ai))=∏i=1nP⁢((g∘ξi)-1⁢(Ai)),

showing that (g∘ξ1),(g∘ξ2),… are independent. For any i, by the change of variables theorem

E⁢(g∘ξi)=∫Ωg∘ξi⁢𝑑P=∫Xg⁢d⁢((ξi)*⁢P)=∫Xg⁢𝑑μ,

so the strong law of large numbers tells us that there is a set Ng∈S with P⁢(Ng)=0 such that for all ω∈Ω∖Ng,

∑i=1n(g∘ξi)⁢(ω)n→∫Xg⁢𝑑μ.

But

∑i=1n(g∘ξi)⁢(ω)n=∑i=1n1n⁢∫Xg⁢𝑑δξi⁢(ω)=∫Xg⁢𝑑μnω,

so for all ω∈Ω∖Ng,

∫Xg⁢𝑑μnω→∫Xg⁢𝑑μ.

Because X is separable, Theorem 1 tells us that there is a metric d that induces the topology of X and some countable dense subset G of Ud⁢(X) such that a sequence νn in 𝒫⁢(X) converges narrowly to ν if and only if

∫Xg⁢𝑑νn→∫Xg⁢𝑑ν,g∈G.

Now let N=⋃g∈GNg, which satisfies P⁢(N)=0, and if ω∈Ω∖N then for each g∈G,

∫Xg⁢𝑑μnω→∫Xg⁢𝑑μ.

This implies that for all μnω converges narrowly to μ. That is, there is a set N∈S with P⁢(N)=0 such that for all ω∈Ω∖N, the sample distribution μnω converges narrowly to the common pushforward measure μ, proving the claim. ∎