Infinite product measures
1 Introduction
The usual proof that the product of a collection of probability measures exists uses Fubini’s theorem. This is unsatisfying because one ought not need to use Fubini’s theorem to prove things having only to do with -algebras and measures. In this note I work through the proof given by Saeki of the existence of the product of a collection of probability measures.11 1 Sadahiro Saeki, A Proof of the Existence of Infinite Product Probability Measures, Amer. Math. Monthly 103 (1996), no. 8, 682–682. We speak only about the Lebesgue integral of characteristic functions.
2 Rings of sets and Hopf’s extension theorem
If is a set and is a collection of subsets of , we call a ring of sets when (i) and (ii) if and belong to then and belong to . If is a ring of sets and , then . Equivalently, one checks that a collection of subsets of is a ring of sets if and only if (i) and (ii) if and belong to then and belong to , where is the symmetric difference. One checks that indeed a ring of sets is a ring with addition and multiplication . If is a nonempty collection of subsets of , one proves that there is a unique ring of sets that (i) contains and (ii) is contained in any ring of sets that contains . We call the ring of sets generated by .
If is a ring of subsets of a set , we call an algebra of sets when . Namely, an algebra of sets is a unital ring of sets. If is a nonempty collection of subsets of , one proves that there is a unique algebra of sets that (i) contains and (ii) is contained in any algebra of sets that contains . We call the algebra of sets generated by .
For a nonempty collection of subsets of a set , we denote by the smallest -algebra of subsets of such that .
If is a ring of subsets of a set and is a function such that (i) and (ii) when is a countable subset of whose members are pairwise disjoint and which satisfies , then
we call a measure on . The following is Hopf’s extension theorem.22 2 Karl Stromberg, Probability for Analysts, p. 52, Theorem A3.6.
Theorem 1 (Hopf’s extension theorem).
Suppose that is a set, that is a ring of subsets of , and that is a measure on . If there is a countable subset of with for each and such that , then there is a unique measure whose restriction to is equal to .
3 Semirings of sets
If is a set and is a collection of subsets of , we call a semiring of sets when (i) , (ii) if and belong to then , and (iii) if and belong to then there are pairwise disjoint such that
If is a semiring of subsets of a set , we call a semialgebra of sets when . One proves that if is a semialgebra, then the collection of all finite unions of elements of is equal to the algebra generated by , and that each element of is equal to a finite union of pairwise disjoint elements of .33 3 V. I. Bogachev, Measure Theory, volume I, p. 8, Lemma 1.2.14.
4 Cylinder sets
Suppose that is a nonempty collection of probability spaces and let
If for each and is finite, we call
a cylinder set. Let be the collection of all cylinder sets. One checks that is a semialgebra of sets.44 4 S. J. Taylor, Introduction to Measure and Integration, p. 136, §6.1, Lemma.
Lemma 2.
Suppose that is a function such that
whenever are pairwise disjoint elements of whose union is equal to . Then there is a unique probability measure on whose restriction to is equal to .
Proof.
Let be the collection of all finite unions of cylinder sets. Because is a semialgebra of sets, is the algebra of sets generated by , and any element of is equal to a finite union of pairwise disjoint elements of . Let . There are pairwise disjoint whose union is equal to . Suppose also that is a countable subset of with pairwise disjoint members whose union is equal to . Moreover, as there are pairwise disjoint such that . On the one hand, are pairwise disjoint cylinder sets with union , so
On the other hand, are pairwise disjoint cylinder sets with union , so
Hence,
this conclusion does not involve . Thus it makes sense to define to be this common value, and this defines a function . For , , i.e. the restriction of to is equal to .
If is a countable subset of whose members are pairwise disjoint and , for each let be pairwise disjoint cylinder sets with union . Then
is a countable subset of whose elements are pairwise disjoint and with union , so
But for each ,
so
This shows that is a measure. Then applying Hopf’s extension theorem, we get that there is a unique measure whose restriction to is equal to . It is apparent that the -algebra generated by a semialgebra is equal to the -algebra generated by the algebra generated by the semialgebra, so . Because the restriction of to is equal to , the restriction of to is equal to . Now suppose that is a measure whose restriction to is equal to . For , there are disjoint with . Then
showing that the restriction of to is equal to the restriction of to , from which it follows that . ∎
5 Product measures
Suppose that is a nonempty collection of probability spaces. The product -algebra is , the -algebra generated by the cylinder sets. We define by
for and with , which is finite.
Lemma 3.
Suppose that is the set of positive integers. If is a countable subset of with pairwise disjoint elements whose union is equal to , then
Proof.
For each , there is some and such that
with for . Let , let , and let . If ,
If and for each and we set for , then because and are disjoint and , we have and therefore there is some , , such that . Thus
(1) |
Either or . In the case we have for and thus
hence by (1),
In the case , we have for and thus
hence by (1) we have that for , ,
Therefore, integrating over for ,
so
We have thus established that for any , , and ,
(2) |
Suppose by contradiction that
i.e.
(3) |
If
for all , then integrating over we contradict (3). Hence there is some such that
Suppose by induction that for some , and
If
for all , then integrating over we contradict (3). Hence there is some such that
Therefore, by induction we obtain that for any , there are such that
(4) |
Write . Because , there is some for which . For , (4) states
But (2) tells us
a contradiction. Therefore,
proving the claim. ∎
Lemma 4.
Suppose that is an uncountable set. If is a countable subset of with pairwise disjoint elements whose union is equal to , then
Proof.
For each , there are with , and is finite. Then is countable. Let , let be the collection of cylinder sets corresponding to the probability spaces , and define by
for and with , which is finite. satisfies
Let , i.e. . Then is a countable subset of with pairwise disjoint elements whose union is equal to , and applying Lemma 3 we get that
and therefore
∎
Now by Lemma 2 and the above lemma, there is a unique probability measure on whose restriction to is equal to . That is, when are probability spaces and is the collection of cylinder sets corresponding to these probability spaces, with and defined by
for , then there is a unique probability measure on the the product -algebra such that for each cylinder set . We call the product measure, and write
and