Orbital stability for NLS

Jordan Bell
April 3, 2014

Let n=3, and take p<43. Some of the material we will present for general n when it doesn’t simplify our work to use n=3.

The (defocusing) nonlinear Schrödinger equation is

iϕt+Δϕ+|ϕ|p-1ϕ=0.

ϕ(x,0)=ϕ0H1.

For a function ψ on n, the orbit of the function under the symmetries of NLS is

𝒢ψ={ψ(+x0)eiγ:(x0,γ)n×𝕋}.

We say that ψ is orbitally stable if initial data being near it implies that the solution of NLS is near it always.

We define

ρ(ϕ(t),𝒢ψ)=inf(x0,γ)n×𝕋ϕ(+x0,t)eiγ-ψH1.

The ground state equation is

Δu-u+|u|p-1u=0.

The ground state equation comes from the solution ϕ(x,t)=eitu(x) of NLS. It is a fact that there is a positive bounded solution R of the ground state equation, which we call a ground state.

Theorem 1.

The ground state R is orbitally stable: for any ϵ>0 there is a δ(ϵ)>0 such that if

ρ(ϕ0,𝒢R)<δ(ϵ)

then for all t>0

ρ(ϕ(t),𝒢R)<ϵ.

We define the energy functional by

[ϕ]=|ϕ|2+|ϕ|2-2p+1|ϕ|p+1dx,

so [ϕ] is a function of time but not of space.

It is a fact that for each t there are x0=x0(t) and γ=γ(t) such that

ϕ(+x0,t)eiγ-RH1=ρ(ϕ(t),𝒢R).

Let w=ϕ(+x0,t)eiγ-R; so w(t)H1=ρ(ϕ(t),𝒢R).

Let Δ=[ϕ0]-[R]. We have

Δ = [ϕ(,t]-[R]
= [ϕ(+x0,t)eiγ]-[R]
= [R+w]-[R].

We shall express [R+w] as a Taylor expansion about R. We compute the first variation as follows:

d[R]w = wR¯+Rw¯+wR¯+Rw¯-|R|p-1(wR¯+Rw¯)
= 2wR+wR-w|R|p-1R
= 2w(-ΔR+R-|R|p-1R)
= 0,

where we used the fact that R is real valued, integration by parts, and the fact that R is a solution of the ground state equation. So the first variation of at R is 0.

We now compute the second variation of .

d2[R][w] = 2-wΔw¯+|w|2-p-12Rp-1w2-p-12Rp-1|w|2
-Rp-1|w|2
= 2-wΔw¯+|w|2-p-12Rp-1w2-p+12Rp-1|w|2

Write w=u+iv. Then we have

d2[R][w] = 2-uΔu-vΔv+u2+v2-Rp-1(pu2+v2)

Define

L+=-Δ+1-pRp-1  L-=-Δ+1-Rp-1,

which gives

(L+u,u)L2=-uΔu+u2-pu2Rp-1

and

(L-v,v)L2=-vΔv+v2-v2Rp-1.

Thus

d2[R][w]=2(L+u,u)L2+2(L-v,v)L2.

And we assert that the remainder term of the Taylor series is O(|w|3), because R is bounded. Therefore

Δ=(L+u,u)L2+(L-v,v)L2+O(|w|3).

We can bound |w|3 using the Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality, which gives us (for n=3)

wL33C0wL23/2wL23/2C0wH13,

for some C0 that doesn’t depend on w. Therefore

Δ=(L+u,u)L2+(L-v,v)L2+O(wH13),

so there is some C such that

Δ(L+u,u)L2+(L-v,v)L2-CwH13.