Laguerre polynomials and Perron-Frobenius operators
1 Laguerre polynomials
1.1 Definition and generating functions
Let . For and let
called the Laguerre polynomials. Using the Leibniz rule for yields
The generating function for the Laguerre polynomials is11 1 N. N. Lebedev, Special Functions and Their Applications, p. 77, §4.17.
Define
where
and
satisfies
1.2 Differential equations satisfied by Laguerre polynomials
1.3 Integral formulas for Laguerre polynomials
For , , , using the series for one calculates22 2 N. N. Lebedev, Special Functions and Their Applications, p. 132, §5.15, Example 2.
(5) |
Applying this with , , , yields
i.e.
(6) |
Now, it is a fact that
and using this and (6), we get that for and ,
(7) |
We remind ourselves that for and ,
For , using this and one checks that
Then one gets, for ,
Therefore for and ,
(8) |
1.4 Orthogonality of Laguerre polynomials
1.5 Asymptotics for Laguerre polynomials
It can be proved that for , with ,33 3 N. N. Lebedev, Special Functions and Their Applications, p. 87, §4.22. for ,
1.6 Laguerre expansions
Suppose that is piecewise smooth in every interval , , and . Let
. It can be proved that44 4 N. N. Lebedev, Special Functions and Their Applications, p. 88, §4.23, Theorem 3. if is continuous at then
and if is not continuous at then
which makes sense because is a priori piecewise continuous.
Let and . Integrating by parts,
Thus
For a positive integer,
Define
Using
we obtain, as ,
Doing the change of variable with and then applying (6) with and ,
Therefore
whence, for ,
Therefore, for , , ,
2 Integral operators
We remind ourselves that, for ,
is an orthonormal basis for .
For define
For and , define
We have established, with ,
Hence
for
and
Then
The following states the trace of the operator .55 5 cf. A. A. Kirillov, Elements of the Theory of Representations, p. 211, §13, Theorem 2.
Theorem 1.
.
3 Hardy spaces
For let . Let be the collection of holomorphic functions such that for any , is bounded and such that
Define , for , by
For define
called a Perron-Frobenius operator. denotes Lebesgue measure.
Let
for , with . Because , it makes sense to define by
Define by
We prove that and are conjugate.66 6 Marius Iosifescu and Cor Kraaikamp, Metrical Theory of Continued Fractions, p. 9, Proposition 1.1.1.
Theorem 2.
.
Proof.
Let and set . Then
We calculate
Then
It is a fact that for and for ,
Using this,
Thus, as ,
that is,
∎